http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_logo.jpg

Customs News Bulletin

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img01.jpg

 

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img02.jpg

 

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img03.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img04.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img05.jpg

 

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img06.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img07.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img08.jpg

http://www.lexisnexis.co.za/images/jacobsens/jacobsens_img09.jpg

 

6 April 2016

 

 

Latest News

POSSIBLE SAFEGUARD DUTIES TO BE IMPOSED BY ITAC AGAINST INCREASED IMPORTS OF CERTAIN IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTS

(Comments due by 13 April 2016)

The rates of duty on various steel products were increased from free to 10% on 18 December 2015 following a request by ArchelorMittal which was approved by the International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC).

ITAC’s recommendations related to the tariff review on 77 steel product codes in Chapters 72 and 73 of the SACU Harmonised Customs Tariff as requested by the South African Iron and Steel Institute, ArcelorMittal South Africa and Evraz Highveld Steel and Vanadium, which have applied for the maximum 10 percent allowed for tariff protection from cheap imports.

The final determinations were approved by the Department of Trade and Industry for a 10 percent ad valorem duty on zinc-coated or galvanised steel, aluminium-zinc coated steel and colour coated steel products. Some of the approval conditions included that ArcelorMittal SA would invest R250 million in its colour line and Safal Steel would spend R300m on its metal coating line in 2017.

Refer to ITAC Report 517 of 15 December 2015 for more information.

In terms of South Africa’s commitments under the WTO Uruguay Round, the bound rate on these iron and steel products in question is 10% at time of importation.

The South African Iron & Steel Institute (SAISI) an industry body, on behalf of its members producing the iron and steel products in question further produced information to convince ITAC that the applicant submitted prima facie information to indicate:

  • Events cited can be regarded as unforeseen developments that led to the increased volumes of imports;  

  • surge in the volumes of imports; and

  • SACU industry is suffering serious injury;

  • There is a causal link between the serious injury suffered by the applicant and the surge in volumes of imports. 

The International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC) therefore decided to proceed with an investigation for remedial action in the form of a safeguard against the increased imports of certain flat-rolled products of iron, non-alloy steel or other alloy steel (not including stainless steel), whether or not in coils (including products cut-to length and ‘narrow strip’), not further worked than hot-rolled (hot-rolled flat), not clad, plated or coated, excluding grain-oriented silicon electrical steel.  The application was published in Government Gazette No. 39860 dated 24 March 2016 under Notice No. 149 of 2016 under the title: “NOTICE OF AN INITIATION OF THE INVESTIGATION FOR REMEDIAL ACTION IN THE FORM OF A SAFEGUARD AGAINST THE INCREASED IMPORTS OF CERTAIN FLAT-ROLLED PRODUCTS OF IRON, NON-ALLOY STEEL OR OTHER ALLOY STEEL (NOT INCLUDING STAINLESS STEEL), WHETHER OR NOT IN COILS (INCLUDING PRODUCTS CUT-TO-LENGTH AND ‘NARROW STRIP’), NOT FURTHER WORKED THAN HOT-ROLLED (HOT-ROLLED FLAT), NOT CLAD, PLATED OR COATED, EXCLUDING GRAIN-ORIENTED SILICON ELECTRICAL STEEL”.

The Applicant (the South African Iron & Steel Institute (SAISI) an industry body, on behalf of its members producing the iron and steel products in question) submitted that a confluence of events forms the basis of the unforeseen development that supports the application. That is, ultimately the considerable oversupply of steel, and specifically the subject products, in the world today causing a surge in the volumes of imports into the SACU.

The Applicant stated that during the Uruguay Round of negotiations, South Africa did not foresee the following events:

  • The unprecedented steep rate of increase in steel production capacity (including the subject products) over the ensuing two decades (more than doubled since 1994) to support growing construction and manufacturing activity, as well as to help build infrastructure, particularly in emerging economies;

  • The significant market downturns in emerging (and other) economies and the resultant contraction of demand for steel that contribute to the imbalance between capacity and demand, that is, the global oversupply of steel (including the subject products);

  • Record export volumes by countries with excess capacity, fuelled by excess steel supply;

  • Given the global nature of the steel industry, excess capacity in one region can potentially displace production in other regions, thus harming producers in those markets. This has already led to several trade actions by major steel markets.

  • Recent trade measures by those countries are a result of all the above named unforeseen developments, and the fact that their markets are now protected, contracts the global demand for steel even further, exasperating the problem of increased imports into the SACU;

  • The oversupply of steel (including the subject products) has led to a deterioration in the financial situation of steelmakers globally and also the SACU. The excess capacity is considered as one of the main challenges facing the global steel sector today; and 

  • Despite slowing demand growth and the existing excess capacity, there are several new investment projects underway and planned (especially in current net-importing countries) in the steel industry that will result in global steelmaking capacity to continue to expand and causing the SACU to expect further increases of imports of the subject products.

The applicant made allegations of serious injury and casual link, and it was investigated by ITAC.

The period of investigation for data evaluation for the purposes of determining the allegation of serious injury  is 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2014 plus additional seven months information for  2012 to 2015 (01 January to 31 July).

The injury analysis relates to information submitted by ArcelorMittal South Africa Limited (AMSA’s), a member of SAISI with a collective output of the like or directly competitive products constituting a major proportion (approximately more than 70%) of the total domestic production of those products.  

The Applicant alleged and submitted prima facie information indicating that it is experiencing serious injury in the form of a decline in sales volumes, output, market share, utilisation of capacity and employment for the period 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2014.

The applicant further experienced serious injury in the form of a decline in sales volumes, output, market share, and utilisation of capacity for the seven months period 1 January to 31 July (2012 – 2015).  

On this basis the Commission found that prima facie information was submitted to indicate that the SACU industry was suffering serious injury which could be causally linked to the surge in the volumes of imports of the subject products.

The products under investigation are described as certain flat-rolled products of iron, non-alloy steel or other alloy steel (not including stainless steel), whether or not in coils (including products cut-to-length and ‘narrow strip’), not further worked than hot-rolled (hot-rolled flat), not  clad, plated or coated, excluding grain-oriented silicon electrical steel.

The tariff subheadings in question with their descriptions are indicated with an * below:

HS Subheading

Description

72.08

Flat-rolled products of iron or non-alloy steel, of a width of 600 mm or more, hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated:

7208.10*

In coils, not further worked than hot-rolled, with patterns in relief

7208.2

Other, in coils, not further worked than hot-rolled, pickled:

7208.25*

Of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more

7208.26*

Of a thickness of 3 mm or more but less than 4,75 mm

7208.27*

Of a thickness of less than 3 mm

7208.3

Other, in coils, not further worked than hot-rolled:

7208.36*

Of a thickness exceeding 10 mm

7208.37*

Of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more but not exceeding 10 mm

7208.38*

Of a thickness of 3 mm or more but less than 4,75 mm

7208.39*

Of a thickness of less than 3 mm

7208.40*

Not in coils, not further worked than hot-rolled, with patterns in relief

7208.5

Other, not in coils, not further worked than hot-rolled:

7208.51*

Of a thickness exceeding 10 mm

7208.52*

Of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more but not exceeding 10 mm

7208.53*

Of a thickness of 3 mm or more but less than 4,75 mm

7208.54*

Of a thickness of less than 3 mm

7208.90*

Other

72.11

FLAT-ROLLED PRODUCTS OF IRON OR NON-ALLOY STEEL, OF A WIDTH OF LESS THAN 600 MM, NOT CLAD, PLATED OR COATED:

7211.1

Not further worked than hot-rolled:

7211.13

Rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm and a thickness of not less than 4 mm, not in coils and without patterns in relief

7211.14*

Other, of a thickness of 4,75 mm or more

7211.19*

Other

72.25

FLAT-ROLLED PRODUCTS OF OTHER ALLOY STEEL, OF A WIDTH OF 600 MM OR MORE:

7225.1

Of silicon-electrical steel:

7225.11

Grain-oriented

7225.19

Other

7225.30*

Other, not further worked than hot-rolled, in coils

7225.40*

Other, not further worked than hot-rolled, not in coils

7225.50

Other, not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced)

7225.9

Other:

7225.91

Electrolytically plated or coated with zinc

7225.92

Otherwise plated or coated with zinc

7225.99*

Other

72.26

FLAT-ROLLED PRODUCTS OF OTHER ALLOY STEEL, OF A WIDTH OF LESS THAN 600 MM:

7226.1

Of silicon-electrical steel:

7226.11

Grain-oriented

7226.19

Other

7226.20

Of high speed steel

7226.9

Other:

7226.91*

Not further worked than hot-rolled

7226.92

Not further worked than cold-rolled (cold reduced)

7226.99*

Other

Only the products that are marked with an asterisk are under investigation. However, due to the nature of the lay-out of the HS subheadings and for the purposes of better identification and simplification all the subheadings of the headings in question are indicated above.

The Southern African Customs Union (SACU) product is described as certain flat-rolled products of iron, non-alloy steel or other alloy steel (not including stainless steel), whether or not in coils (including products cut-to-length and ‘narrow strip’), not further worked than hot-rolled (hot-rolled flat), not  clad, plated or coated, excluding grain-oriented silicon electrical steel.

The investigation will be conducted in accordance with the International Trade Administration Act, 2002 (ITA Act) and the International Trade Administration Commission Safeguard Regulations (SGR) read with the World Trade Organization Agreement on Safeguards (the Safeguard Agreement).

In the notice ITAC states that if any information is considered to be confidential, a non-confidential version of the information must be submitted for the public file, simultaneously with the confidential version.  In submitting a non-confidential version, the following rules are strictly applicable and parties must indicate:

  • where confidential information has been omitted and the nature of such information;

  • reasons for such confidentiality;

  • a summary of the confidential information which permits a reasonable understanding of the substance of the confidential information; and

  • in exceptional cases, where information is not susceptible to summary, reasons must be submitted to this effect. 

This rule applies to all parties and to all correspondence with and submissions to ITAC, which unless indicated to be confidential and filed together with a non-confidential version, will be placed on the public file and be made available to other interested parties.

All information submitted, including non-confidential copies thereof, should be received by the Senior Manager: Trade Remedies II by 13 April 2016.  

Interested parties are invited to submit comments on the initiation of the investigation or any information regarding this matter to the following address:

Physical address

Senior Manager: Trade Remedies II

International Trade Administration Commission

Block E – The DTI Campus    PRETORIA

77 Meintjies Street

Synnyside

PRETORIA

SOUTH AFRICA     

Postal address

Senior Manager: Trade Remedies II 

International Trade Administration Commission 

Private Bag X753 0001 SUNNYSIDE      

SOUTH AFRICA PRETORIA

Any interested party may request an oral hearing provided that reasons are given for not relying on written submissions only. 

Parties requesting an oral hearing shall provide the Commission with a detailed agenda for, and a detailed version, including a non-confidential version, of the information to be discussed at the oral hearing at the time of the request.  

Contact the investigating officers, Mr Edwin Mkwanazi at +27 12 394 3742 or Ms Mercy Mutheiwana at 012 394 3907, or at fax number 012 394 0518 for more information. 

 

Customs Tariff Applications and Outstanding Tariff Amendments

The International Trade Administration Commission (ITAC) is responsible for tariff investigations, amendments, and trade remedies in South Africa and on behalf of SACU.

Tariff investigations include: Increases in the customs duty rates in Schedule No. 1 Part 1 of Jacobsens. These applications apply to all the SACU Countries, and, if amended, thus have the potential to affect the import duty rates in Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland and South Africa.

Reductions in the customs duty rates in Schedule No. 1 Part 1. These applications apply to all the SACU Countries, and, if amended, thus have the potential to affect the import duty rates in Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland and South Africa.

Rebates of duty on products, available in the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), for use in the manufacture of goods, as published in Schedule No. 3 Part 1, and in Schedule No. 4 of Jacobsens. Schedule No. 3 Part 1 and Schedule No. 4, are identical in all the SACU Countries.

Rebates of duty on inputs used in the manufacture of goods for export, as published in Schedule No. 3 Part 2 and in item 470.00. These provisions apply to all the SACU Countries.

Refunds of duties and drawbacks of duties as provided for in Schedule No. 5. These provisions are identical in all the SACU Countries.

Trade remedies include: Anti-dumping duties (in Schedule No. 2 Part 1 of Jacobsens), countervailing duties to counteract subsidisation in foreign countries (in Schedule No. 2 Part 2), and safeguard duties (Schedule No. 2 Part 3), which are imposed as measures when a surge of imports is threatening to overwhelm a domestic producer, in accordance with domestic law and regulations and consistent with WTO rules.

To remedy such unfair pricing, ITAC may, at times, recommend the imposition of substantial duties on imports or duties that are equivalent to the dumping margin (or to the margin of injury, if this margin is lower)

Countervailing investigations are conducted to determine whether to impose countervailing duties to protect a domestic industry against the unfair trade practice of proven subsidised imports from foreign competitors that cause material injury to a domestic producer.

Safeguard measures, can be introduced to protect a domestic industry against unforeseen and overwhelming foreign competition and not necessarily against unfair trade, like the previous two instruments.

Dumping is defined as a situation where imported goods are being sold at prices lower than in the country of origin, and also causing financial injury to domestic producers of such goods. In other words, there should be a demonstrated causal link between the dumping and the injury experienced.

The International Trade Commission of South Africa (ITAC) also publishes Sunset Review Applications in relation to anti-dumping duty in terms of which any definitive anti-dumping duty will be terminated on a date not later than five years from the date of imposition, unless the International Trade Administration Commission determines, in a review initiated before that date on its own initiative or upon a duly substantiated request made by or on behalf of the domestic industry, that the expiry of the duty would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury.

The International Trade Administration published a document entitled: International Trade Administration Act: Initiation of investigation for remedial action in form of safeguard against increased imports of certain flat-rolled products of iron, non-alloy steel or other alloy steel, whether or not in coils

Responses and any information regarding this matter must be submitted in writing by 13 April 2016.

Contact the investigating officers Mr Edwin  Mkwanazi at telephone number: +27 12 394 3742 or Ms Mercy Mutheiwana at telephone number: +27 12 394 3907 or at fax number: +27 12 394 0518 for more information.

The document was published in Government Gazette No. 39860 of 24 March 2016 under Notice No. 149 of 2016.

Download the notice at http://www.gov.za/sites/www.gov.za/files/39860_gen149.pdf

 

 

 

 

Customs Tariff Amendments

With the exception of certain parts of Schedule No. 1, such as Schedule No. 1 Part 2 (excise duties), Schedule No. 1 Part 3 (environmental levies), Schedule No. 1 Part 5 (fuel and road accident fund levies), the other parts of the tariff is amended by SARS based on recommendations made by ITAC resulting from the investigations relating to Customs Tariff Applications received by them. The ITAC then investigates and makes recommendations to the Minister of Trade and Industry, who requests the Minister of Finance to amend the Tariff in line with the ITAC's recommendations. SARS is responsible for drafting the notices to amend the tariff, as well as for arranging for the publication of the notices in Government Gazettes.

During the annual budget speech by the Minister of Finance in February, it was determined that parts of the tariff that are not amended resulting from ITAC recommendations, must be amended through proposals that are tabled by the Minister of Finance.

Once a year, big tariff amendments are published by SARS, which is in line with the commitments of South Africa and SACU under international trade agreements.

Under these amendments, which are either published in November or early in December, the import duties on goods are reduced under South Africa's international trade commitments under existing trade agreements.

The South African Budget was tabled by the Minister of Finance, Mr Pravin Gordhan on 24 February 2016.

Increases to environmental levy on certain products were proposed with effect from 1 April 2016, and proposals were made to increase the fuel and road accident fund levy on petrol and diesel with effect from 6 April 2016. Notices to implement these increases were published in Government Gazette No. 39892 of 31 March 2016. Notices were also published in the same Gazette to rectify some editorial errors/omissions that occurred in the Budget Review. Rebate provisions consequential to the increases in excise duty were also published in the same Gazette.   

The Notice Numbers were R. 392 to and R. 403.

The amendments will be sent to subscribers under cover of Jacobsens Supplement 1069. For more information see the subscribers notice to Supplement 1069 or view the Customs Watch.

 

 

Customs Rule Amendments

The Customs and Excise Act is amended by the Minister of Finance. Certain provisions of the Act are supported by Customs and Excise Rules, which are prescribed by the Commission of SARS. These provisions are numbered in accordance with the sections of the Act. The rules are more user-friendly than the Act, and help to define provisions which would otherwise be unclear and difficult to interpret.

Forms are also prescribed by rule, and are published in the Schedule to the Rules.

There were no Rule amendments at time of publication.

On 31 December 2015, SARS Customs published an Amendment of the Customs and Excise Rules under section 120. Rule 120.09A was inserted to provide for currency conversions for determining value of goods exported or to be exported

The rule amendment (supposedly DAR/157) was published on 31 December 2015 in Government Gazette 39569 under Notice No. R. 1294.

 

LexisNexis

 

 

 

 

 

Contact Information:

 

Contact the Author:

Havandren Nadasan
Jacobsens Editor

Tel: 031-268 3510
e-mail to:
newjacobsens@lexisnexis.co.za

 

Leon Marais
Independent Customs Consultant
Tel: 053-203 0727
e-mail to:
leon.marais@intekom.co.za

 

LexisNexis

 

© Customs News Bulletin is prepared for distribution by LexisNexis. It is for information only, and does not constitute the provision of professional advice of any kind. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication can be accepted by the author, copyright owner or publisher.

Copyright: LexisNexis (Pty) Ltd retains the copyright of this email. No part of this email may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the publisher's written permission. Any unauthorised reproduction of this work will constitute a copyright infringement and render the doer liable under both civil and criminal law.

To unsubscribe e-mail jacobsen@lexisnexis.co.za.